Team:KULeuven/12 September 2008
From 2008.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(wet lab) |
m (→Wet Lab) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* We miniprepped some cultures: R0040+J23066+J23109+J23032 and K145278. | * We miniprepped some cultures: R0040+J23066+J23109+J23032 and K145278. | ||
* The end-filling reaction to make J23078 was put on gel. It appeared to be OK. | * The end-filling reaction to make J23078 was put on gel. It appeared to be OK. | ||
- | * We made a number of digests: <div style="margin-left:10px;"> cut with ''Eco''RI and ''Spe''I -> R0040+J23066+J13109+J23032 (succeeded). </div> <div style="margin-left:10px;"> cut with ''Xba''I and ''Eco''R I -> K145278 (failed). </div> <div style="margin-left:10px;"> cut with ''Xba''I and ''Pst'' I -> J23078 (PCR product). </div> <div style="margin-left:10px;"> cut with ''Spe''I and ''Pst'' I -> C0062, J23109 and I712074 ( | + | * We made a number of digests: <div style="margin-left:10px;"> cut with ''Eco''RI and ''Spe''I -> R0040+J23066+J13109+J23032 (succeeded). </div> <div style="margin-left:10px;"> cut with ''Xba''I and ''Eco''R I -> K145278 (failed). </div> <div style="margin-left:10px;"> cut with ''Xba''I and ''Pst'' I -> J23078 (PCR product). </div> <div style="margin-left:10px;"> cut with ''Spe''I and ''Pst'' I -> C0062, J23109 and I712074 (J23109 failed). </div> |
* We set up two more ligations: J23116+B0034 and K145275. | * We set up two more ligations: J23116+B0034 and K145275. | ||
- | * We also continued our quest for T7 polymerase with UmuD tag. It was suggested that the problem may lie in the fact that we use a gel extract as a template (there might still be a lot of agarose in the sample). Therefore we started step 1 of the PCR (first halve of the tag). We will do step 2 of the PCR (second halve of the tag) tomorrow with the unpurified PCR mix of step 1 as template. | + | * We also continued our quest for T7 polymerase with UmuD tag. It was suggested that the problem may lie in the fact that we use a gel extract as a template (there might still be a lot of agarose in the sample). Therefore we started step 1 of the PCR (first halve of the tag). We will do step 2 of the PCR (second halve of the tag) tomorrow with the unpurified PCR mix of step 1 as template. |
=== Dry Lab === | === Dry Lab === |
Revision as of 20:03, 12 September 2008
dock/undock dropdown
Contents |
Lab Work
Wet Lab
Last Friday, we had a lot of good news. This time it is bad news :-(
- There were no colonies on the plates of three ligations that we electroporated yesterday (J23116+B0032+C0062+B0015, K145253+ K145254 and J23109+J23032+K145001+B0015). We did a PCR test to see whether the other ones were properly ligated. Only one of them seemed alright (K145272).
- We miniprepped some cultures: R0040+J23066+J23109+J23032 and K145278.
- The end-filling reaction to make J23078 was put on gel. It appeared to be OK.
- We made a number of digests: cut with EcoRI and SpeI -> R0040+J23066+J13109+J23032 (succeeded).cut with XbaI and EcoR I -> K145278 (failed).cut with XbaI and Pst I -> J23078 (PCR product).cut with SpeI and Pst I -> C0062, J23109 and I712074 (J23109 failed).
- We set up two more ligations: J23116+B0034 and K145275.
- We also continued our quest for T7 polymerase with UmuD tag. It was suggested that the problem may lie in the fact that we use a gel extract as a template (there might still be a lot of agarose in the sample). Therefore we started step 1 of the PCR (first halve of the tag). We will do step 2 of the PCR (second halve of the tag) tomorrow with the unpurified PCR mix of step 1 as template.
Dry Lab
Modeling
Wiki
Remarks
<< return to notebook | return to homepage >> | ||
< previous friday | ← yesterday | tomorrow → | next monday > |