Team:KULeuven/Project/Output

From 2008.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
m (→Output)
m
 
(23 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
{{:Team:KULeuven/Tools/Navigation_Bar}}
+
{{:Team:KULeuven/Tools/Styling}}
 +
{{:Team:KULeuven/Tools/Scripting}}
 +
{{:Team:KULeuven/Tools/Header}}
 +
 
 +
[[Image:pictogram_output.png|120px|right]]
==Output==
==Output==
 +
<div style="float:right">[[Image:GFP.png|350px]]</div>
 +
We have been searching for an easy accessible output system, that could provide us qualitative and quantitative information in a quick and easy way. The choice for GFP was easily made.
 +
 +
===BioBricks===
 +
[[Image:project_output.jpg|left]]
 +
<br>
 +
 +
 +
===Components===
 +
A GFP with a C-terminal [https://2008.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Literature#LVA_tag LVA tag] for rapid degradation of the protein (Andersen et al, 1998) was chosen so that we can follow the output signal quickly in time. The Tet promoter ([http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_R0040 '''BBa_R0040''']) behaves as described in the [https://2008.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Project/Input Input] section. For fine-tuning reasons, the RBS was chosen [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_B0032 '''BBa_B0032'''] with a relative efficiency of 0,3.
 +
 +
===Action===
 +
This is a very easy system. As the [https://2008.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Project/Input Input] results in inactivation of the ''tet''R repressor, there is GFP production, proportional to the input signal.
 +
 +
==References==
 +
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Jun;64(6):2240-6.
 +
New unstable variants of green fluorescent protein for studies of transient gene expression in bacteria.
 +
Andersen JB, Sternberg C, Poulsen LK, Bjorn SP, Givskov M, Molin S.
 +
PMID: 9603842
 +
 +
{{:Team:KULeuven/Tools/Components}}

Latest revision as of 22:57, 29 October 2008

  dock/undock dropdown  

Pictogram output.png

Contents

Output

GFP.png

We have been searching for an easy accessible output system, that could provide us qualitative and quantitative information in a quick and easy way. The choice for GFP was easily made.

BioBricks

Project output.jpg



Components

A GFP with a C-terminal LVA tag for rapid degradation of the protein (Andersen et al, 1998) was chosen so that we can follow the output signal quickly in time. The Tet promoter ([http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_R0040 BBa_R0040]) behaves as described in the Input section. For fine-tuning reasons, the RBS was chosen [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_B0032 BBa_B0032] with a relative efficiency of 0,3.

Action

This is a very easy system. As the Input results in inactivation of the tetR repressor, there is GFP production, proportional to the input signal.

References

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Jun;64(6):2240-6.
New unstable variants of green fluorescent protein for studies of transient gene expression in bacteria.
Andersen JB, Sternberg C, Poulsen LK, Bjorn SP, Givskov M, Molin S.
PMID: 9603842



Retrieved from "http://2008.igem.org/Team:KULeuven/Project/Output"