"
TUDelft/14 August 2008
From 2008.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Bavandenberg (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Template:TUDelftiGEM2008_menu_home}} | {{Template:TUDelftiGEM2008_menu_home}} | ||
| - | |||
Today we started a set of new transformation with various slight differences in order to see if it would help in transformation efficiency. | Today we started a set of new transformation with various slight differences in order to see if it would help in transformation efficiency. | ||
We tried solving the punches from the registry in either: <br> | We tried solving the punches from the registry in either: <br> | ||
| Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
As positive controls we transformed with pUC18 in H2O or in old TE with a blanc paper punch added, both incubated with the other samples at 42 for 20'. | As positive controls we transformed with pUC18 in H2O or in old TE with a blanc paper punch added, both incubated with the other samples at 42 for 20'. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
{{Template:TUDelftiGEM2008_sidebar}} | {{Template:TUDelftiGEM2008_sidebar}} | ||
Revision as of 07:24, 26 August 2008
[http://www.tudelft.nl ]
[http://www.tudelft.nl ]
Today we started a set of new transformation with various slight differences in order to see if it would help in transformation efficiency.
We tried solving the punches from the registry in either:
- old TE
- fresh TE
- H2O
And with these we either:
- added 4 ul to 50 ul competent cells
- added 50 ul competent cells to all the DNA solution including the punch
As positive controls we transformed with pUC18 in H2O or in old TE with a blanc paper punch added, both incubated with the other samples at 42 for 20'.
