"
Team:TUDelft/Temperature conclusions
From 2008.igem.org
(New page: {{Template:TUDelftiGEM2008}} {{Template:TUDelftiGEM2008_menu_home}} =Conclusions & Recommendations= ==Conclusions== After a great summer of hard work, we've learned quite a few things. ...) |
(→Conclusions & Recommendations) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Template:TUDelftiGEM2008_menu_home}} | {{Template:TUDelftiGEM2008_menu_home}} | ||
| - | =Conclusions | + | =Conclusions Temperature= |
| - | |||
After a great summer of hard work, we've learned quite a few things. The most important about the thermometer RNA are listed below. | After a great summer of hard work, we've learned quite a few things. The most important about the thermometer RNA are listed below. | ||
Revision as of 13:45, 29 October 2008
Conclusions Temperature
After a great summer of hard work, we've learned quite a few things. The most important about the thermometer RNA are listed below.
Temperature sensitivity - Protein measurements
Due to the fact it is impossible to state that lysis has a constant efficiency, it is not possible to take the cell density before lysis as a value for correcting luciferase activity. Therefore it is important to measure something in the soluble fraction of your sample correlating to actual biomass . We decided to use a total protein content (Bicinchoninic acid assay) for the value to correct luciferase activity by. However, the lysis buffer (of unknown composition) in the luciferase assay kit interfered with our protein measurements. To prevent this interference we tried precipitating the protein in the samples using 4 different methods to get rid of the (unknown) interfering agent in the buffer. Although calibration curves which were first treated with lysis buffer and then precipitated varied from quite linear (R2=0.983) to not linear at all (R2<0), samples containing the soluble fraction of lysed cells, usually gave protein contents of below 0 mg/ml.
A different approach to solve this problem of lysis buffer interference was trying various different lysis methods, including sonication, using glass beads in a fastprep or using lysozyme and glass sand in a bead beater. Although it looked like all these methods destroy some of the activity of luciferase in the sample, time was lacking to optimize each method. The sonication protocol, although time consuming, seemed most reliable in our experiments. Still, this method is not optimal, as samples lysed with lysis buffer show a lot higher raw luciferase output, although it is not known what the total protein content of these samples is.
Temperature sensitivity - Results with sonication
Using sonication of our samples, we obtained our most reliable results. These indicated, as displayed here, that our strain K115035 shows the temperature induced switch-like behavior which was the aim of our project.
