Team:TUDelft/Color testing
From 2008.igem.org
(→Results) |
(→Results) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Behind the gene names is mentioned what the size of the gene would be, idi is larger due to primer design. [[Image:TUDelftgelcut090908.jpg|thumb|center|200px|Figure 1: ''Taq'' polymerase PCR of atoB (1188 bp), idi (552 bp) and ispA (903 bp)]] | Behind the gene names is mentioned what the size of the gene would be, idi is larger due to primer design. [[Image:TUDelftgelcut090908.jpg|thumb|center|200px|Figure 1: ''Taq'' polymerase PCR of atoB (1188 bp), idi (552 bp) and ispA (903 bp)]] | ||
On these PCR products, we did a touchdown PCR with new primers, which were designed to add the biobrick prefix and suffix to the gene. This is described [https://2008.igem.org/TUDelft/29_September_2008 here]. The results of this experiment are displayed in figure 2. | On these PCR products, we did a touchdown PCR with new primers, which were designed to add the biobrick prefix and suffix to the gene. This is described [https://2008.igem.org/TUDelft/29_September_2008 here]. The results of this experiment are displayed in figure 2. | ||
- | [[Image:TUDelftTDPCR.jpg|thumb|250px| | + | [[Image:TUDelftTDPCR.jpg|thumb|250px|center|Figure 2: TD PCR with prefix/suffix primers of atoB (1188 bp), idi (552 bp) and ispA (903 bp)]] |
Revision as of 15:59, 29 October 2008
Contents |
Color pathway testing
Correct genes testing
The first indication of whether obtaining of the genes was a succes, is the correct size of DNA product on a gel. DNA sequencing will provide final certainty of the correct genes.
Correct activity testing
The ultimate proof of activity of the pathway would obviously be a colored Escherichia coli colony. However, to identify individual working enzymes, we'd need specific enzymatic assays. Furthermore this is useful, as some enzymatic assays could yield parameters for the modeling guys. Due to a lack of time, we've not looked any further into these assays.
Results
After we had our first succesful PCR on the genes of E. coli with Taq polymerase (Lab notebook August 19th) we tried to repeat it using Pfx polymerase, but this didn't work (Lab notebook September 4th). In the end we decided to repeat the experiment with Taq polymerase as the desired sequences were not very long, thus the chance for mutations due to the lack of proofreading of Taq polymerase was small. In the end the sequences will be verified through DNA sequencing. The gel of this PCR is displayed in figure 1.
Behind the gene names is mentioned what the size of the gene would be, idi is larger due to primer design.On these PCR products, we did a touchdown PCR with new primers, which were designed to add the biobrick prefix and suffix to the gene. This is described here. The results of this experiment are displayed in figure 2.